Tag: Politics

Arrogant

In a recent thread on a social media site, I posted a link to an article on The Intercept which includes a recording of House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer trying to brow-beat progressive Democratic primary candidate Levi Tillemann into getting out of the of the race for the Colorado’s 6th Congressional District in favor of the DCCC’s preferred candidate, high-powered corporate lawyer Jason Crow. I offered it as evidence that the Democratic Party is anything but democratic.

Anyone who has noted the behavior of the DCCC and the DNC for the last few years knows of any number of instances where the party leadership has quashed (or attempted to quash) progressive and leftist voices from prominence within the party, all the while demanding that all progressives fall in line with their centrist views and preferred candidates. For many, including myself, this pattern of behavior has been disturbing as well as alienating. Some of us have begun organizing within the party under the banner “Justice Democrats,” others have left the part altogether, some for the Green Party, others for the Democratic Socialists and elsewhere.

Unfortunately, publicly questioning the motives and actions of the Democratic party leadership inspires many rank-and-file Democrats to shout down any criticism of the party and/or its methods. Two years out from the 2016 election, woe be to anyone who has the temerity to mention that they supported Jill Stein, as I did and still do, or, in some circles, brings up Bernie Sanders.

I have been told that I am personally responsible for the Trompe presidency. I’ve been called a self-centered child. No matter that my gender is female, I have been called a “Bernie Bro” more than a few times. I’ve been told repeatedly, as I continue to stand up for myself, that I am arrogant. I have recently been told that the country is “in flames” because of my support of, and vote for, the Green Party’s presidential candidate.

At the point where any discussion of non-support for the Democratic Party and/or its leadership reaches this level of rhetoric, the possibility of further reasonable discourse would appear to have been trashed. You will almost certainly be told, as Steny Hoyer helpfully explained to Levi Tillemann, that you don’t understand “how the world works.”

I created this post in response to such a discussion. The first draft of it was filled with the hurt and anger I felt, mixed with amusement when the person I was having an exchange with concluded their final post in the thread with “Up yours!” My assumption, based on prior experience, was that I would be unfollowed and/or blocked. I also assumed that it then wouldn’t matter what I said or did, there would be no way to reach yet another centrist Democrat, and that political discussions of any sort are no longer worthwhile: everyone is so wrapped up in narrative that an actual discussion of the merits of any particular point of view aren’t productive: either we already agree or I won’t be listened to because there is no incentive to go beyond one’s tribal viewpoint.

But the person I had had the argument surprised me: they reached out via private message, explaining their point of view, and when I sent a thoughtful response, they thanked me for it. I found that hopeful.

We are still very far from being on the same page in our opinions, but I think that at the end of this minor crisis in our long-distance friendship, we found that the friendship is still intact, and we are also more likely to hear each other’s views without perceiving them as an attack or threat. The risk turned out, in this case, to be worth taking, and neither of us has had to back down from our positions in order to move forward.

What this means for situations like the Hoyer/Tillemann exchange above is less clear. My hope is that Levi Tillemann stays in the race for the Colorado 6th. I believe that he will, but I say that from clear across the country and from outside the Democratic Party. I’d be more willing to support Democratic candidates if I knew that the DCCC and DNC were allowing the voters to choose their candidates rather than the party leadership dictating to those voters who their candidates should be.

In truth, I believe that the party would be stronger, the country would be stronger, the candidates the party picks will be stronger for having earned the voters’ support through cultivating a more direct and authentic connection with the voters, rather than fishing for advertising $$$ via the DCCC and the DNC.

 

You Can’t Ignore Reality Forever

Towards the end of his life, my cousin Gary dressed like Teddy Roosevelt. He had the trademark Knudsen hat, round glasses, and moustache.

To be fair, it was no stretch for Gary to admire The Rough Rider, and it is also true that he participated in various historical reenactment activities as a hobby with his kids. But I believe the real reason for this particular cosplay was that Gary was hiding something.

His cheeks were swollen. He was careful not to open his mouth too wide, because if he wasn’t you could see that his teeth were a dark, mucky brown. Though he refused to see a dentist, it was clear that he had abscesses in several places. Though he would never let on, he must have been in a great deal of pain, and had to have been suffering for a very long time, as infection spread through his mouth.

Wrapping himself in the guise of a historic Republican president was, in fact, denial. He was covering his sickness in the appearance of a famously vigorous and adventurous historical figure, to deflect hard questions and allow himself not to deal with the urgent health issue he refused to acknowledge.

–

There are those who would like to see Ronald Reagan’s visage added to that icon of American hegemony, Mount Rushmore, along with two other famous Republican presidents, Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. Nevermind that the monument is a desecration of the Lakotas’ sacred Paha Sapa, or that Ronald Reagan is, to many, a controversial figure. Those facts are not convenient and disrupt the narrative of those who would like to elevate him to the same level in the national pantheon as those currently represented on that hill.

Reagan has much to answer for, which, of course, he never will. But his political descendents, still championing supplyside economics, dangerous deregulation, and massive federal deficits, must answer for the increasing financial, educational, and social deficits that result from such policies. Yet there is no indication that they intend to reconcile their fanciful notions with reality. They deny the decaying of our infrastructure and the increasing danger to the American public that come with the neoconservative tenets they embrace without consideration of the possible cost.

Wrapping these disastrous policies in the old Hollywood luster of Ronald Reagan, or, for that matter, the vaunted vigor of Theodore Roosevelt, will not diminish their eventual effects. Denial only makes it easier to ignore what is surely coming as we travel down this destructive road.

–

A few months after I saw Gary for the final time, the infection from his abscesses spread to his brain. He slipped into a coma, and a week later he was dead. His family was devastated by his tragic, sudden death.

We need to avoid the horrible mistake of wrapping our problems in the glamour of a dead President.